Mageia 2019-0180: docker security update

    Date19 May 2019
    CategoryMageia
    1084
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Security issues fixed for containerd, docker, docker-runc and golang-github-docker-libnetwork: CVE-2018-16873: cmd/go: remote command execution during "go get -u" (bsc#1118897)
    MGASA-2019-0180 - Updated docker packages fix security vulnerability
    
    Publication date: 19 May 2019
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2019-0180.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 6
    CVE: CVE-2018-16873,
         CVE-2018-16874,
         CVE-2018-16875
    
    Security issues fixed for containerd, docker, docker-runc and
    golang-github-docker-libnetwork:
    
    CVE-2018-16873: cmd/go: remote command execution during "go get -u"
    (bsc#1118897)
    CVE-2018-16874: cmd/go: directory traversal in "go get" via curly braces
    in import paths (bsc#1118898)
    CVE-2018-16875: crypto/x509: CPU denial of service (bsc#1118899)
    
    Non-security issues fixed for docker:
    
    Disable leap based builds for kubic flavor (bsc#1121412)
    Allow users to explicitly specify the NIS domainname of a container
    (bsc#1001161)
    Update docker.service to match upstream and avoid rlimit problems
    (bsc#1112980)
    Allow docker images larger then 23GB (bsc#1118990)
    Docker version update to version 18.09.0-ce (bsc#1115464)
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24374
    - https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2019-02/msg00078.html
    - https://github.com/docker/docker-ce/blob/v18.09.3/CHANGELOG.md
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16873
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16874
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16875
    
    SRPMS:
    - 6/core/docker-18.06.3-1.2.mga6
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.26,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.68,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.