Mageia 2019-0394: pacemaker security update

    Date19 Dec 2019
    54
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The updated packages fix security vulnerabilities: A use-after-free flaw was found in pacemaker up to and including version 2.0.1 which could result in certain sensitive information to be leaked via the system logs. (CVE-2019-3885)
    MGASA-2019-0394 - Updated pacemaker packages fix security vulnerabilities
    
    Publication date: 19 Dec 2019
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2019-0394.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 7
    CVE: CVE-2019-3885,
         CVE-2018-16877,
         CVE-2018-16878
    
    The updated packages fix security vulnerabilities:
    
    A use-after-free flaw was found in pacemaker up to and including version
    2.0.1 which could result in certain sensitive information to be leaked
    via the system logs. (CVE-2019-3885)
    
    A flaw was found in the way pacemaker's client-server authentication was
    implemented in versions up to and including 2.0.0. A local attacker could
    use this flaw, and combine it with other IPC weaknesses, to achieve local
    privilege escalation. (CVE-2018-16877)
    
    A flaw was found in pacemaker up to and including version 2.0.1. An
    insufficient verification inflicted preference of uncontrolled processes
    can lead to DoS. (CVE-2018-16878)
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24691
    - https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/17/1
    - https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/18/2
    - http://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-security-updates/2019-April/005369.html
    - https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1278
    - https://usn.ubuntu.com/3952-1/
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-3885
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16877
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-16878
    
    SRPMS:
    - 7/core/pacemaker-1.1.19-2.1.mga7
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the LinuxSecurity Privacy news articles?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/25-what-do-you-think-of-the-linuxsecurity-privacy-news-articles?task=poll.vote&format=json
    25
    radio
    [{"id":"90","title":"Love them!","votes":"35","type":"x","order":"1","pct":92.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"91","title":"I'm indifferent","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":5.26,"resources":[]},{"id":"92","title":"Not interested in this topic","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":2.63,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.