Mageia 2020-0226: clamav security update

    Date 24 May 2020
    348
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    Updated clamav packages fix security vulnerabilities: Fixed a vulnerability in the ARJ archive-parsing module in ClamAV 0.102.2 that could cause a denial-of-service condition. Improper bounds checking of an unsigned variable results in an out-of-bounds read which causes a
    MGASA-2020-0226 - Updated clamav packages fix security vulnerabilities
    
    Publication date: 24 May 2020
    URL: https://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2020-0226.html
    Type: security
    Affected Mageia releases: 7
    CVE: CVE-2020-3327,
         CVE-2020-3341
    
    Updated clamav packages fix security vulnerabilities:
    
    Fixed a vulnerability in the ARJ archive-parsing module in ClamAV 0.102.2
    that could cause a denial-of-service condition. Improper bounds checking
    of an unsigned variable results in an out-of-bounds read which causes a
    crash. Special thanks to Daehui Chang and Fady Othman for helping identify
    the ARJ parsing vulnerability (CVE-2020-3327).
    
    Fixed a vulnerability in the PDF-parsing module in ClamAV 0.101 - 0.102.2
    that could cause a denial-of-service condition. Improper size checking of
    a buffer used to initialize AES decryption routines results in an
    out-of-bounds read, which may cause a crash. OSS-Fuzz discovered this
    vulnerability (CVE-2020-3341)
    
    References:
    - https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26653
    - https://blog.clamav.net/2020/05/clamav-01023-security-patch-released.html
    - https://www.debian.org/lts/security/2020/dla-2215
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-3327
    - https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-3341
    
    SRPMS:
    - 7/core/clamav-0.102.3-1.mga7
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    How do you feel about the elimination of the terms 'blacklist' and 'slave' from the Linux kernel?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/32-how-do-you-feel-about-the-elimination-of-the-terms-blacklist-and-slave-from-the-linux-kernel?task=poll.vote&format=json
    32
    radio
    [{"id":"112","title":"I strongly support this change - racially charged language should not be used in the code and documentation of the kernel and other open-source projects.","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"1","pct":42.86,"resources":[]},{"id":"113","title":"I'm indifferent - this small change will not affect broader issues of racial insensitivity and white privilege.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"114","title":"I'm opposed to this change - there is no need to change language that has been used for years. It doesn't make sense for people to take offense to terminology used in community projects.","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.