SUSE: 2019:1859-1 moderate: libgcrypt

    Date 16 Jul 2019
    767
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that solves one vulnerability and has two fixes is now available.
    
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for libgcrypt
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:1859-1
    Rating:             moderate
    References:         #1097073 #1125740 #1138939 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-12904
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Open Buildservice Development Tools 15
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that solves one vulnerability and has two fixes
       is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for libgcrypt fixes the following issues:
    
       Security issues fixed:
    
       - CVE-2019-12904: The C implementation of AES is vulnerable to a
         flush-and-reload side-channel attack because physical addresses are
         available to other processes. (The C implementation is used on platforms
         where an assembly-language implementation is unavailable.) (bsc#1138939)
    
       Other bugfixes:
    
       - Don't run full FIPS self-tests from constructor (bsc#1097073)
       - Skip all the self-tests except for binary integrity when called from the
         constructor (bsc#1097073)
       - Enforce the minimal RSA keygen size in fips mode (bsc#1125740)
       - avoid executing some tests twice.
       - Fixed a race condition in initialization.
       - Fixed env-script-interpreter in cavs_driver.pl
       - Fixed redundant fips tests in some situations causing failure to boot in
         fips mode. (bsc#1097073)
    
       This helps during booting of the system in FIPS mode with insufficient
       entropy.
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Open Buildservice Development Tools 15:
    
          zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Development-Tools-OBS-15-2019-1859=1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15:
    
          zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Module-Basesystem-15-2019-1859=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Open Buildservice Development Tools 15 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64):
    
          libgcrypt-cavs-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt-cavs-debuginfo-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt-debugsource-1.8.2-6.17.1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64):
    
          libgcrypt-debugsource-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt-devel-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt-devel-debuginfo-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt20-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt20-debuginfo-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt20-hmac-1.8.2-6.17.1
    
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 (x86_64):
    
          libgcrypt20-32bit-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt20-32bit-debuginfo-1.8.2-6.17.1
          libgcrypt20-hmac-32bit-1.8.2-6.17.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-12904.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1097073
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1125740
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1138939
    
    _______________________________________________
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-security-updates
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    If you are using full-disk encryption: are you concerned about the resulting performance hit?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/34-if-you-are-using-full-disk-encryption-are-you-concerned-about-the-resulting-performance-hit?task=poll.vote&format=json
    34
    radio
    [{"id":"120","title":"Yes","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"1","pct":71.43,"resources":[]},{"id":"121","title":"No ","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":28.57,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.