SUSE: 2019:2013-2 important: bzip2

    Date16 Aug 2019
    CategorySuSE
    364
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
    
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for bzip2
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:2013-2
    Rating:             important
    References:         #1139083 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-12900
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Enterprise Storage 5
    ______________________________________________________________________________
    
       An update that fixes one vulnerability is now available.
    
    Description:
    
       This update for bzip2 fixes the following issues:
    
       - Fixed a regression with the fix for CVE-2019-12900, which caused
         incompatibilities with files that used many selectors (bsc#1139083).
    
    
    Patch Instructions:
    
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
    
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
    
       - SUSE Enterprise Storage 5:
    
          zypper in -t patch SUSE-Storage-5-2019-2013=1
    
    
    
    Package List:
    
       - SUSE Enterprise Storage 5 (aarch64):
    
          bzip2-1.0.6-30.8.1
          bzip2-debuginfo-1.0.6-30.8.1
          bzip2-debugsource-1.0.6-30.8.1
          libbz2-1-1.0.6-30.8.1
          libbz2-1-debuginfo-1.0.6-30.8.1
    
       - SUSE Enterprise Storage 5 (noarch):
    
          bzip2-doc-1.0.6-30.8.1
    
    
    References:
    
       https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-12900.html
       https://bugzilla.suse.com/1139083
    
    _______________________________________________
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://lists.suse.com/mailman/listinfo/sle-security-updates
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.49,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.63,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.88,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.