SUSE: 2019:2278-1 moderate: qemu

    Date04 Sep 2019
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that solves three vulnerabilities and has two fixes is now available.
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for qemu
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:2278-1
    Rating:             moderate
    References:         #1127077 #1135902 #1139926 #1140402 #1143794 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-12155 CVE-2019-13164 CVE-2019-14378
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE CaaS Platform 3.0
       An update that solves three vulnerabilities and has two
       fixes is now available.
       This update for qemu fixes the following issues:
       Security issues fixed:
       - CVE-2019-14378: Security fix for heap overflow in ip_reass on big packet
         input (bsc#1143794).
       - CVE-2019-12155: Security fix for null pointer dereference while
         releasing spice resources (bsc#1135902).
       - CVE-2019-13164: Security fix for qemu-bridge-helper ACL can be bypassed
         when names are too long (bsc#1140402).
       Bug fixes:
       - Provide qcow2 L2 caching improvements, which allows for better storage
         performance in certain configurations (bsc#1139926, ECO-130).
       - Fix setting speed of migration while vm uses hugepages (bsc#1127077).
    Patch Instructions:
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
       - SUSE CaaS Platform 3.0:
          To install this update, use the SUSE CaaS Platform Velum dashboard.
          It will inform you if it detects new updates and let you then trigger
          updating of the complete cluster in a controlled way.
    Package List:
       - SUSE CaaS Platform 3.0 (x86_64):
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.%MINIFYHTML294e1740c64338c7199deb8db6171d4b13%
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the LinuxSecurity Privacy news articles?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"90","title":"Love them!","votes":"35","type":"x","order":"1","pct":92.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"91","title":"I'm indifferent","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":5.26,"resources":[]},{"id":"92","title":"Not interested in this topic","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":2.63,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.