SUSE: 2019:3125-1 important: haproxy

    Date29 Nov 2019
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that solves one vulnerability and has three fixes is now available.
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for haproxy
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:3125-1
    Rating:             important
    References:         #1082318 #1154980 #1157712 #1157714 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-18277
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15
       An update that solves one vulnerability and has three fixes
       is now available.
       This update for haproxy to version 2.0.10 fixes the following issues:
       HAProxy was updated to 2.0.10
       Security issues fixed:
       - CVE-2019-18277: Fixed a potential HTTP smuggling in messages with
         transfer-encoding header missing the "chunked" (bsc#1154980).
       - Fixed an improper handling of headers which could have led to injecting
         LFs in H2-to-H1 transfers creating new attack space (bsc#1157712)
       - Fixed an issue where HEADER frames in idle streams are not rejected and
         thus trying to decode them HAPrpxy crashes (bsc#1157714).
       Other issue addressed:
       - Macro change in the spec file (bsc#1082318)
       More information regarding the release at:;a=commit;h=ac198b92d461515551b95d
    Patch Instructions:
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15:
          zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-HA-15-2019-3125=1
    Package List:
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64):
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"65","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.27,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.2,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.