SUSE: 2019:3125-1 important: haproxy

    Date 29 Nov 2019
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    An update that solves one vulnerability and has three fixes is now available.
       SUSE Security Update: Security update for haproxy
    Announcement ID:    SUSE-SU-2019:3125-1
    Rating:             important
    References:         #1082318 #1154980 #1157712 #1157714 
    Cross-References:   CVE-2019-18277
    Affected Products:
                        SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15
       An update that solves one vulnerability and has three fixes
       is now available.
       This update for haproxy to version 2.0.10 fixes the following issues:
       HAProxy was updated to 2.0.10
       Security issues fixed:
       - CVE-2019-18277: Fixed a potential HTTP smuggling in messages with
         transfer-encoding header missing the "chunked" (bsc#1154980).
       - Fixed an improper handling of headers which could have led to injecting
         LFs in H2-to-H1 transfers creating new attack space (bsc#1157712)
       - Fixed an issue where HEADER frames in idle streams are not rejected and
         thus trying to decode them HAPrpxy crashes (bsc#1157714).
       Other issue addressed:
       - Macro change in the spec file (bsc#1082318)
       More information regarding the release at:;a=commit;h=ac198b92d461515551b95d
    Patch Instructions:
       To install this SUSE Security Update use the SUSE recommended installation methods
       like YaST online_update or "zypper patch".
       Alternatively you can run the command listed for your product:
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15:
          zypper in -t patch SUSE-SLE-Product-HA-15-2019-3125=1
    Package List:
       - SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability 15 (aarch64 ppc64le s390x x86_64):
    sle-security-updates mailing list
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200


    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.