Ubuntu 2479-1: RPM vulnerabilities

    Date19 Jan 2015
    CategoryUbuntu
    36
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several security issues were fixed in RPM.
    ==========================================================================
    Ubuntu Security Notice USN-2479-1
    January 19, 2015
    
    rpm vulnerabilities
    ==========================================================================
    
    A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives:
    
    - Ubuntu 14.10
    - Ubuntu 14.04 LTS
    - Ubuntu 12.04 LTS
    
    Summary:
    
    Several security issues were fixed in RPM.
    
    Software Description:
    - rpm: package manager for RPM
    
    Details:
    
    Florian Weimer discovered that RPM incorrectly handled temporary files. A
    local attacker could use this issue to execute arbitrary code.
    (CVE-2013-6435)
    
    Florian Weimer discovered that RPM incorrectly handled certain CPIO
    headers. If a user or automated system were tricked into installing a
    malicious package file, a remote attacker could use this issue to cause RPM
    to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary
    code. (CVE-2014-8118)
    
    Update instructions:
    
    The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following
    package versions:
    
    Ubuntu 14.10:
      rpm                             4.11.2-3ubuntu0.1
    
    Ubuntu 14.04 LTS:
      rpm                             4.11.1-3ubuntu0.1
    
    Ubuntu 12.04 LTS:
      rpm                             4.9.1.1-1ubuntu0.3
    
    In general, a standard system update will make all the necessary changes.
    
    References:
      http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-2479-1
      CVE-2013-6435, CVE-2014-8118
    
    Package Information:
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/4.11.2-3ubuntu0.1
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/4.11.1-3ubuntu0.1
      https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/4.9.1.1-1ubuntu0.3
    
    
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.49,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.63,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.88,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.