Explore top 10 tips to secure your open-source projects now. Read More

×
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 488
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 488

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE go1.26-openssl Important Security Fixes Advisory 2026-3102-1

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE Python311 Important Memory Error Command Injection Fix 2026-3104-1

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H900
openSUSE

openSUSE php-composer2 Important Vulnerability Update 2026-3105-1

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Opensuse Large Esm H800
openSUSE

openSUSE mariadb-connector-c Important Issue CVE-2026-44172

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 chromium Important Heap Buffer Overflow Vuln 2026-32e3e23696

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Node-Exporter Minor Denial of Service Patch 2026-5924722657

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Low
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 spoofdpi Moderate Configuration Issue Fix 2026-77f23c0bc4

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 yq Important Cross-Site Scripting Vuln 2026-990cdd8329

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora version 43 brings vital security upgrades for Ruby CVE-2026-41316

Calendar White Jul 17, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Is continuous patching actually viable?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/156-is-continuous-patching-actually-viable?task=poll.vote&format=json
156
radio
0
[{"id":503,"title":"Delayed updates invite catastrophic breaches.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":504,"title":"Automated fixes break production environments.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":505,"title":"Manual approvals cannot keep pace.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
200
Ls Advisories Scientific Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorycritical issuesecurity update

Scientific Linux: 15-33-08 Critical Security Update for Firefox

Important: firefox security update. Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:33:08 -0600 Reply-To: Troy Dawson Sender: Security Errata for Scientific Linux From: Troy Dawson Subject: Security ERRATA for firefox on SL3,x i386/x86_64 Comments: To: "This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it." Synopsis: Important: firefox security update Issue date: 2007-12-19 Firefox has had several important security updates. Firefox is no longer supported for Scientific Linux 3. This package essentually removes firefox from your system and replaces it with a link pointing to seamonkey. This package will automatically pull in any seamonkey packages needed to run seamonkey's browser, if those packages are not already installed. SL 3.0.x SRPMS: firefox-1.5.0.12-99.sl3.src.rpm i386: firefox-1.5.0.12-99.sl3.i386.rpm x86_64: firefox-1.5.0.12-99.sl3.i386.rpm firefox-1.5.0.12-99.sl3.x86_64.rpm -Connie Sieh -Troy Dawson . Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:33:08 -0600 Reply-To: Troy Dawson Sender: Security Errata for Scientific L. important, firefox, security, update, reply-to, dawson, sende. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Dec 19, 2007 •Critical Scientific Linux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Is continuous patching actually viable?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/156-is-continuous-patching-actually-viable?task=poll.vote&format=json
156
radio
0
[{"id":503,"title":"Delayed updates invite catastrophic breaches.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":504,"title":"Automated fixes break production environments.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":505,"title":"Manual approvals cannot keep pace.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics