Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 717
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 717

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is automated patching safe for servers?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/152-is-automated-patching-safe-for-servers?task=poll.vote&format=json
152
radio
0
[{"id":491,"title":"No: Bad updates break production","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":492,"title":"Yes: unpatched flase are worse","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":493,"title":"Only with AI-driven testing rollback","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
202

openSUSE Leap 16.0 tor Critical Security Fixes for CVE-2026-44597

An update that solves 6 vulnerabilities and has 6 bug fixes can now be installed.. openSUSE security update: security update for tor ------------------------------------------------------------- Announcement ID: openSUSE-SU-2026:20709-1 Rating: critical References: * bsc#1264341 * bsc#1264342 * bsc#1264343 * bsc#1264344 * bsc#1264345 * bsc#1264346 Cross-References: * CVE-2026-44597 * CVE-2026-44599 * CVE-2026-44600 * CVE-2026-44601 * CVE-2026-44602 * CVE-2026-44603 Affected Products: openSUSE Leap 16.0 ------------------------------------------------------------- An update that solves 6 vulnerabilities and has 6 bug fixes can now be installed. Description: This update for tor fixes the following issues: Changes in tor: - Update to 0.4.9.8 * Fix out-of-bounds read (boo#1264341, CVE-2026-44597, TROVE-2026-011) * Do not attempt or accept BEGIN_DIR via conflux legs (boo#1264342, CVE-2026-44599,TROVE-2026-008) * Adjust conflux out-of-order queue accounting when clearing a queue (boo#1264343, CVE-2026-44600, TROVE-2026-010) * Fix a client-side crash caused by double-close of a circuit while under circuit queue memory pressure (boo#1264344, CVE-2026-44601, TROVE-2026-009) * Fix null pointer dereference when receiving a CERT cell out of order (boo#1264345, CVE-2026-44602, TROVE-2026-006) * Fix off-by-one out-of-bounds read if a malformed BEGIN cell is received (boo#1264346, CVE-2026-44603, TROVE-2026-007) - upate to 0.4.9.5: * first stable release in the 0.4.9 series * introduces a new circuit-level encryption design for better client security * introduce a more scalable way for large relay operators to annotate which relays they run so clients can avoid using too many of them in a single circuit Patch instructions: To install this openSUSE security update use the suse recommended installation methods like YaST online_update or "zypper patch". Alternatively you can run the command listed for yourproduct: - openSUSE Leap 16.0 zypper in -t patch openSUSE-Leap-16.0-packagehub-236=1 Package List: - openSUSE Leap 16.0: tor-0.4.9.8-bp160.1.1 References: * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44597.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44599.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44600.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44601.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44602.html * https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44603.html . This security advisory addresses critical vulnerabilities in tor with installation instructions for openSUSE Leap 16.0.. openSUSE Update tor Bug Fix Critical Update. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 May 10, 2026 Critical OpenSUSE
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is automated patching safe for servers?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/152-is-automated-patching-safe-for-servers?task=poll.vote&format=json
152
radio
0
[{"id":491,"title":"No: Bad updates break production","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":492,"title":"Yes: unpatched flase are worse","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":493,"title":"Only with AI-driven testing rollback","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Your message here