Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 677
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 677

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is automated patching safe for servers?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/152-is-automated-patching-safe-for-servers?task=poll.vote&format=json
152
radio
0
[{"id":491,"title":"No: Bad updates break production","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":492,"title":"Yes: unpatched flase are worse","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":493,"title":"Only with AI-driven testing rollback","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
172

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS USN-7269-2 critical: Intel Microcode DoS

Several security issues were fixed in Intel Microcode.. ========================================================================== Ubuntu Security Notice USN-7269-2 February 24, 2025 intel-microcode vulnerabilities ========================================================================== A security issue affects these releases of Ubuntu and its derivatives: - Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Summary: Several security issues were fixed in Intel Microcode. Software Description: - intel-microcode: Processor microcode for Intel CPUs Details: USN-7269-1 fixed vulnerabilities in Intel Microcode. This update provides the corresponding updates for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. Original advisory details: Ke Sun, Paul Grosen and Alyssa Milburn discovered that some Intel® Processors did not properly implement Finite State Machines (FSMs) in Hardware Logic. A local privileged attacker could use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2024-31068) It was discovered that some Intel® Processors with Intel® SGX did not properly restrict access to the EDECCSSA user leaf function. A local authenticated attacker could use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2024-36293) Ke Sun, Alyssa Milburn, Benoit Morgan, and Erik Bjorge discovered that the UEFI firmware for some Intel® processors did not properly restrict access. An authenticated local attacker could use this issue to cause a denial of service. (CVE-2024-39279) Update instructions: The problem can be corrected by updating your system to the following package versions: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS intel-microcode 3.20250211.0ubuntu0.24.04.1 After a standard system update you need to reboot your computer to make all the necessary changes. References: https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7269-2 https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7269-1 CVE-2024-31068, CVE-2024-36293, CVE-2024-39279 Package Information: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/3.20250211.0ubuntu0.24.04.1 . Intel microcode enhancements for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS targeting various security vulnerabilities and denial of service threats.. Intel Microcode, Ubuntu Updates, Denial of Service. . Severity: Critical. LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Feb 24, 2025 Critical Ubuntu
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is automated patching safe for servers?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/152-is-automated-patching-safe-for-servers?task=poll.vote&format=json
152
radio
0
[{"id":491,"title":"No: Bad updates break production","votes":0,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":492,"title":"Yes: unpatched flase are worse","votes":0,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":493,"title":"Only with AI-driven testing rollback","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Your message here