Explore top 10 tips to secure your open-source projects now. Read More

×
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 496
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 496

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is continuous patching actually viable?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/156-is-continuous-patching-actually-viable?task=poll.vote&format=json
156
radio
0
[{"id":503,"title":"Delayed updates invite catastrophic breaches.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":504,"title":"Automated fixes break production environments.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":505,"title":"Manual approvals cannot keep pace.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
200

Scientific Linux: SLSA-2017:1983-1 Moderate: PostgreSQL Data Access Risks

It was found that some selectivity estimation functions did not check user privileges before providing information from pg_statistic, possibly leaking information. A non-administrative database user could use this flaw to steal some information from tables they are otherwise not allowed to access. (CVE-2017-7484) * It was found that the pg_user_mappings view could disclose information about u [More...]. Synopsis: Moderate: postgresql security and enhancement update Advisory ID: SLSA-2017:1983-1 Issue Date: 2017-08-01 CVE Numbers: CVE-2017-7484 CVE-2017-7486 -- The following packages have been upgraded to a later upstream version: postgresql (9.2.21). Security Fix(es): * It was found that some selectivity estimation functions did not check user privileges before providing information from pg_statistic, possibly leaking information. A non-administrative database user could use this flaw to steal some information from tables they are otherwise not allowed to access. (CVE-2017-7484) * It was found that the pg_user_mappings view could disclose information about user mappings to a foreign database to non-administrative database users. A database user with USAGE privilege for this mapping could, when querying the view, obtain user mapping data, such as the username and password used to connect to the foreign database. (CVE-2017-7486) -- SL7 x86_64 postgresql-debuginfo-9.2.21-1.el7.i686.rpm postgresql-debuginfo-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-libs-9.2.21-1.el7.i686.rpm postgresql-libs-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-9.2.21-1.el7.i686.rpm postgresql-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-contrib-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-devel-9.2.21-1.el7.i686.rpm postgresql-devel-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-docs-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-plperl-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-plpython-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-pltcl-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-server-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-static-9.2.21-1.el7.i686.rpm postgresql-static-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-test-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm postgresql-upgrade-9.2.21-1.el7.x86_64.rpm - Scientific Linux Development Team . Scheduled PostgreSQL upgrade on Scientific Linux to address security vulnerabilities related to memory leaks and enhance data access management. Advisory ID: SLSA-2017:1983-1.. postgresql security, scientific linux update, data leak issues, user privilege management. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Aug 21, 2017 Scientific Linux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

Is continuous patching actually viable?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/156-is-continuous-patching-actually-viable?task=poll.vote&format=json
156
radio
0
[{"id":503,"title":"Delayed updates invite catastrophic breaches.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":504,"title":"Automated fixes break production environments.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":505,"title":"Manual approvals cannot keep pace.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200