Explore top 10 tips to secure your open-source projects now. Read More

×
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 509
Alerts This Week
Warning Icon 1 509

Stay Secure with the Latest Linux Advisories

Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 Firefox Update 152.0.6 Advisory FEDORA-2026-365cce949c

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 rust-cargo-rpmstatus Update 2026-6d5a7be3b9 RUSTSEC Issues

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 Rust-opendal Important Update Quick-XML RUSTSEC-2026-0194

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 43 perl-DBI Critical Heap Overflow Resolution 2026-71d7e4d1da

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 mingw-glib2 Important Buffer Overflow Fix CVE-2026-58016

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Important
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 43 ansible-collection-ansible-posix Critical Fix for CVE-2026-11837

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H800
Fedora

Fedora 44 freerdp 3.29.0 Enhancement Notice 2026-a9bfa4361b

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 perl-HTTP-Date Important Denial of Service Fix 2026-8cec3cbf5b

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Critical
Fedora Large Esm H900
Fedora

Fedora 44 ImageMagick Critical Stack Buffer Overflow Vuln 2026-b45924b5e5

Calendar White Jul 16, 2026
Important
Filter%20icon Refine advisories
X Clear Filters
X Clear Filters
View More

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Is continuous patching actually viable?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/156-is-continuous-patching-actually-viable?task=poll.vote&format=json
156
radio
0
[{"id":503,"title":"Delayed updates invite catastrophic breaches.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":504,"title":"Automated fixes break production environments.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":505,"title":"Manual approvals cannot keep pace.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
Loading...

Explore Latest Linux Security advisories

We found -8 articles for you...
200
Ls Advisories Scientific Esm H240
Price Tag%201security advisorymoderatesecurity fix

Scientific Linux 7: SLSA-2018:3324-1 Moderate: Fuse SELinux Bypass Fix

fuse: bypass of the "user_allow_other" restriction when SELinux is active (CVE-2018-10906) SL7 x86_64 fuse-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm fuse-debuginfo-2.9.2-11.el7.i686.rpm fuse-debuginfo-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm fuse-libs-2.9.2-11.el7.i686.rpm fuse-libs-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm fuse-devel-2.9.2-11.el7.i686.rpm fuse-devel-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm - Scientific Linux Deve [More...]. Synopsis: Moderate: fuse security update Advisory ID: SLSA-2018:3324-1 Issue Date: 2018-10-30 CVE Numbers: CVE-2018-10906 -- Security Fix(es): * fuse: bypass of the "user_allow_other" restriction when SELinux is active (CVE-2018-10906) -- SL7 x86_64 fuse-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm fuse-debuginfo-2.9.2-11.el7.i686.rpm fuse-debuginfo-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm fuse-libs-2.9.2-11.el7.i686.rpm fuse-libs-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm fuse-devel-2.9.2-11.el7.i686.rpm fuse-devel-2.9.2-11.el7.x86_64.rpm - Scientific Linux Development Team . The revised patch for the fuse system tackles issues related to user access evasion during the operation of SELinux, reinforcing overall system integrity.. SELinux Security, Fuse Update, Linux Advisory, Scientific Linux, Security Patch. . LinuxSecurity.com Team

Calendar%202 Nov 26, 2018 Scientific Linux
News Add Esm H240

Get the latest News and Insights

Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.

Community Poll

More Polls

Is continuous patching actually viable?

No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum {0} answer(s).
Please select maximum {0} answer(s).
/main-polls/156-is-continuous-patching-actually-viable?task=poll.vote&format=json
156
radio
0
[{"id":503,"title":"Delayed updates invite catastrophic breaches.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":1,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":504,"title":"Automated fixes break production environments.","votes":1,"type":"x","order":2,"pct":50,"resources":[]},{"id":505,"title":"Manual approvals cannot keep pace.","votes":0,"type":"x","order":3,"pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200

Search Topics