Some years ago, Scott McNealy quipped that electronic privacy is dead and that we need to get over it.[1] Like many good one-liners, the assertion is an over-simplification but has enough piercing truth to it, to get heads nodding. . It is of course, possible to make things private for any given definition of "private" and any given definition of "things". Sweeping generalizations are easily tripped over with specifics. Now, rather than dive down a rabbit hole trying to define terms like 'privacy', I would like to take a different tack. The link for this article located at IT World is no longer available. . Scott McNealy's remark on privacy unveils the intricate challenges tied to digital surveillance amidst our data-driven society, urging reflection on privacy's true essence. Electronic Privacy, Digital Rights, Data Protection. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
One small step backwards in electronic freedom. Thomas C. Greene writes... "FBI Director Louis Freeh remains determined to require cryptography users to register their keys so that the Bureau can crack their secret files whenever a judge can be persuaded . . .. One small step backwards in electronic freedom. Thomas C. Greene writes... "FBI Director Louis Freeh remains determined to require cryptography users to register their keys so that the Bureau can crack their secret files whenever a judge can be persuaded that information contained therein might facilitate a prosecution. " The link for this article located at Theregister.com - Thomas C. Greene   is no longer available. . One small step backwards in electronic freedom. Thomas C. Greene writes...'FBI Director Louis Freeh . small, backwards, electronic, freedom, thomas, greene, writes, director, louis, freeh. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.