What's worse for a website hosting company: getting taken down by hackers, or failing to properly configure your network, sparking downtime and lost revenue for customers? . The CEO of website hosting service Go Daddy has said that the company's six-hour outage Monday had nothing to do with a hacktivist, despite a hacker having claimed credit for launching a distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS) that scuttled the Go Daddy network. The link for this article located at Information Week is no longer available. . Investigating GoDaddy's service interruption: Misfortune or DDoS strike? Examination of the extended outage and effects on users.. GoDaddy Outage, DDoS, Network Configuration, Cyber Incident. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
A friend of mine suggested that I should include as boilerplate in my security stories, a line like: "Of course, if you were running desktop Linux or using a Mac, you wouldn't have this problem." She's got a point. Windows is now, always has been, and always will be insecure. Here's why.. First, desktop Windows stands firmly on a foundation as a stand-alone PC operating system. It was never, ever meant to work in a networked world. So, security holes that existed back in the day of Windows for Workgroups, 1991, are still with us today in 2009 and Windows 7. Most of these problems come down to Windows has IPCs (interprocess communications), procedures that move information from one program to another, that were never designed with security in mind. Windows and Windows applications rely on these procedures to get work done. Over the years they've included DLLs (dynamic link libraries), OCXs (Object Linking and Embedding (OLE) Control Extension), and ActiveX. No matter what they're called, they do the same kind of work and they do it without any regard to security. The link for this article located at IT World is no longer available. . First, desktop Windows stands firmly on a foundation as a stand-alone PC operating system. It was ne. friend, suggested, should, include, boilerplate, security, stories. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Five days after being brought to its knees by spam UUNet's service is still struggling to get back to normal. In a statement issued this morning UUNet said its customers in the UK "may continue to experience some delays in email . . . . Five days after being brought to its knees by spam UUNet's service is still struggling to get back to normal. In a statement issued this morning UUNet said its customers in the UK "may continue to experience some delays in email traffic". Most of the spam has now been deleted but "mail will continue to pass slowly for the next 48 to 72 hours", the outfit said. UUNet also said it reckons no genuine email has been lost although that will be of little comfort to the outfit's customers who've been without access to their email for almost a week. The link for this article located at TheRegister is no longer available. . UUNet continues to struggle with persistent email slowdowns a week post-spam assault, impacting overall service performance.. UUNet Email Issues, Spam Effects, Service Down, Network Stability. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.