A good case can also be made that Linux is inherently more stable and secure than Microsoft products, either because it's based on a better core of code or because it's open source, and many individuals have a stake in monitoring and making repairs.. . .. A good case can also be made that Linux is inherently more stable and secure than Microsoft products, either because it's based on a better core of code or because it's open source, and many individuals have a stake in monitoring and making repairs. However, with all this discussion, there rarely seems to be any mention of an even more secure and completely free version of UNIX: BSD. While Linux is the darling of the hacker set, it is far from the least expensive or even the most secure open source operating system available. Linux isn?t even running on the widest range of systems. All three of those distinctions belong to an academically developed version of UNIX that originated at the University of California, Berkeley and whose various versions are often referred to collectively as BSD (Berkeley Software Distribution). The link for this article located at ZDNet AU is no longer available. . The resilience and protection offered by Linux, especially in relation to BSD, underscore its strengths and the vigilant support from its community.. Linux Security, BSD Comparison, Open Source Stability, OS Vulnerability, Secure Operating Systems. . LinuxSecurity.com Team
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.