It is a well known fact that viruses, trojan horses, worms, spam, and other forms of malware present a real threat to all modern-day organizations and affect productivity and business operations negatively. According to the 2006 FBI Crime and Security Survey, 97% of organizations have anti-virus software installed, yet 65% have been affected by a virus attack at least once during the previous 12 months. Network World cited studies that placed the cost of fighting Blaster, SoBig.F, Sober and other email viruses at $3.5 billion for US companies alone. Similarly a 2006 study by the British government found that 43% of companies in the United Kingdom were infected by viruses during 2005. . Responsible organizations agree that they need to protect their network from virus attacks by installing an email security product. Yet malicious code is becoming more sophisticated and is advanced everyday as virus writers hone their skills and sharpen their code to stay one-step ahead of virus detection methods, penetrating anti-virus and firewall solutions with alarming regularity. The success of these viruses is, to a large part, linked to the flawed logic and inherent weakness of protection strategies that are based on a single scanning engine to assess the threat of incoming files. The link for this article located at Info Sec Writers is no longer available. . Organizations must implement multiple virus detection engines to effectively combat evolving cybersecurity threats and enhance malware detection capabilities.. Virus Protection, Malware Threats, Network Security Strategy. . Brittany Day
Here's an article for people trying to justify security to their management. It talks about getting involved with the SANS organization, making the case for security, virus detection, PKI and E-Commerce, and more. "The first rule of IT . . .. Here's an article for people trying to justify security to their management. It talks about getting involved with the SANS organization, making the case for security, virus detection, PKI and E-Commerce, and more. "The first rule of IT security as perceived by experts today emerges from this axiom: because threats are ever-changing, you will always be working on security. ... The second rule, we believe, is that Electronic Commerce both exacerbates the problems related to IT security while presenting government and industry with their best opportunity yet to conquer many threats. EC puts billions of transactional dollars at risk, raising the stakes for the IT community. In fact, the world’s total investment in EC might be seen as the trust account from which security will substantially draw. Our third and final rule allows that complexity and contradiction will continue to exist but can be reconciled by forces both within the government—where better policies and technical guidance will eventually be carved out—and in industry, which will function best as government’s partner. Thus, our third rule is simply this: in the end, you will solve your security problem." The link for this article located at Government Computer News is no longer available. . Here's an article for people trying to justify security to their management. It talks about getting . here's, article, people, trying, justify, security, their, management, talks, about. . Anthony Pell
Get the latest Linux and open source security news straight to your inbox.