Debian: DSA-1778-1: New mahara packages fix cross-site scripting

    Date22 Apr 2009
    CategoryDebian
    36
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that mahara, an electronic portfolio, weblog, and resume builder, is prone to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks because of missing input sanitization of the introduction text field in user
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-1778-1                    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                                 Nico Golde
    April 22nd, 2009                        http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : mahara
    Vulnerability  : insufficient input sanitization
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2009-0664
    
    
    It was discovered that mahara, an electronic portfolio, weblog, and
    resume builder, is prone to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks because
    of missing input sanitization of the introduction text field in user
    profiles and any text field in a user view.
    
    
    The oldstable distribution (etch) does not contain mahara.
    
    For the stable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.0.4-4+lenny2.
    
    For the testing distribution (squeeze), this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.1.3-1.
    
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your mahara packages.
    
    Upgrade instructions
    - --------------------
    
    wget url
            will fetch the file for you
    dpkg -i file.deb
            will install the referenced file.
    
    If you are using the apt-get package manager, use the line for
    sources.list as given below:
    
    apt-get update
            will update the internal database
    apt-get upgrade
            will install corrected packages
    
    You may use an automated update by adding the resources from the
    footer to the proper configuration.
    
    
    Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 alias lenny
    - --------------------------------
    
    Debian (stable)
    - ---------------
    
    Stable updates are available for alpha, amd64, arm, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390 and sparc.
    
    Source archives:
    
      http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mahara/mahara_1.0.4-4+lenny2.dsc
        Size/MD5 checksum:     1303 934fdf17abf7221e30fe68c925377126
      http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mahara/mahara_1.0.4-4+lenny2.diff.gz
        Size/MD5 checksum:    39307 3193a6e1483f1375430cc236230bc9cc
    
    Architecture independent packages:
    
      http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mahara/mahara_1.0.4-4+lenny2_all.deb
        Size/MD5 checksum:  1637064 9fc42b011a826509edc1fccdb9bc149e
      http://security.debian.org/pool/updates/main/m/mahara/mahara-apache2_1.0.4-4+lenny2_all.deb
        Size/MD5 checksum:     7830 30c258196ccbdddc6c4f25e1534ba96e
    
    
      These files will probably be moved into the stable distribution on
      its next update.
    
    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For apt-get: deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
    For dpkg-ftp: ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security dists/stable/updates/main
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    Package info: `apt-cache show ' and http://packages.debian.org/
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"24","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.55,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.36,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.09,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.