Debian: DSA-2178-1: pango1.0 security update

    Date02 Mar 2011
    CategoryDebian
    30
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that pango did not check for memory allocation failures, causing a NULL pointer dereference with an adjustable offset. This can lead to application crashes and potentially arbitrary code execution.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2178-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    March 02, 2011                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pango1.0
    Vulnerability  : NULL pointer dereference
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-0064
    
    It was discovered that pango did not check for memory allocation
    failures, causing a NULL pointer dereference with an adjustable
    offset.  This can lead to application crashes and potentially
    arbitrary code execution.
    
    The oldstable distribution (lenny) is not affected by this problem.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.28.3-1+squeeze2.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution (sid),
    this problem will be fixed soon.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pango1.0 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":62.5,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":12.5,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.