Debian: DSA-2199-1: iceape security update

    Date23 Mar 2011
    CategoryDebian
    27
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update for the Iceape internet suite, an unbranded version of Seamonkey, updates the certificate blacklist for several fraudulent HTTPS certificates.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2199-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 23, 2011                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceape
    Vulnerability  : none in iceape
    Problem type   : none in iceape
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : not available
    
    This update for the Iceape internet suite, an unbranded version of
    Seamonkey, updates the certificate blacklist for several fraudulent
    HTTPS certificates. 
    
    More details can be found in a blog posting by Jacob Appelbaum of the 
    Tor project:
    https://blog.torproject.org/category/tags/ssl-tls-ca-tor-certificates-torbrowser
    
    The oldstable distribution (lenny) is not affected. The iceape package only
    provides the XPCOM code.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.11-4.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.0.13-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceape packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.