Debian: DSA-2204-1: imp4 security update

    Date27 Mar 2011
    CategoryDebian
    39
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Moritz Naumann discovered that imp4, a webmail component for the horde framework, is prone to cross-site scripting attacks by a lack of input sanitising of certain fetchmail information.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2204-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Steffen Joeris
    March 27, 2011                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : imp4
    Vulnerability  : Insufficient input sanitising
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2010-3695 
    Debian Bug     : 598584
    
    
    Moritz Naumann discovered that imp4, a webmail component for the horde
    framework, is prone to cross-site scripting attacks by a lack of input
    sanitising of certain fetchmail information.
    
    
    For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.2-4lenny3.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.3.7+debian0-2.1, which was already included in the squeeze
    release.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy) and the unstable distribution
    (sid), this problem has been fixed in version 4.3.7+debian0-2.1.
    
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your imp4 packages.
    
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":11.11,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"3","pct":33.33,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.