Debian: DSA-2320-1: dokuwiki regression fix

    Date08 Oct 2011
    CategoryDebian
    49
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The dokuwiki update included in Debian Lenny 5.0.9 to address a cross site scripting issue (CVE-2011-2510) had a regression rendering links to external websites broken. This update corrects that regression.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2320-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                           Thijs Kinkhorst
    October 8, 2011                        http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : dokuwiki
    Vulnerability  : regression fix
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2011-2510 
    Debian Bug     : 644145
    
    The dokuwiki update included in Debian Lenny 5.0.9 to address a cross
    site scripting issue (CVE-2011-2510) had a regression rendering links
    to external websites broken. This update corrects that regression.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (lenny), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.0.20080505-4+lenny4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your dokuwiki packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.26,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.68,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.