Debian: DSA-2414-2: fex regression

    Date25 Feb 2012
    CategoryDebian
    49
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that the last security update for F*X, DSA-2414-1, introduced a regression. Updated packages are now available to address this problem.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2414-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                                Nico Golde
    February 25, 2012                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : fex
    Vulnerability  : insufficient input sanitization
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-0869
    
    It was discovered that the last security update for F*X, DSA-2414-1,
    introduced a regression. Updated packages are now available to address
    this problem.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 20100208+debian1-1+squeeze3.
    
    The testing (wheezy) and unstable (sid) distributions are not affected
    by this problem.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your fex packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.