Debian: DSA-2457-2: New icedove/iceweasel packages fix regression

    Date13 May 2012
    CategoryDebian
    47
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The updates DSA-2457 and DSA-2458 for Iceweasel and Icedove introduced a regression, which could lead to crashes when interpreting some Javascript statements.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2457-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    May 13, 2012                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel / icedove
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-0467 CVE-2012-0470 CVE-2012-0471 CVE-2012-0477 
                     CVE-2012-0479
    
    The updates DSA-2457 and DSA-2458 for Iceweasel and Icedove introduced
    a regression, which could lead to crashes when interpreting some
    Javascript statements.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.5.16-15 for Iceweasel and 2.0.11-12 for Icedove.
    
    The unstable distribution (sid) is not affected.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel and icedove packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.