Debian: DSA-2612-1: ircd-ratbox security update

    Date24 Jan 2013
    CategoryDebian
    38
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that a bug in the server capability negotiation code of ircd-ratbox could result in denial of service. For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2612-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    January 24, 2013                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ircd-ratbox
    Vulnerability  : programming error
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2012-6084
    
    It was discovered that a bug in the server capability negotiation code of
    ircd-ratbox could result in denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.0.6.dfsg-2squeeze1.
    
    For the testing distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.0.7.dfsg-3.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.0.7.dfsg-3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ircd-ratbox packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.