Debian: DSA-2650-2: libvirt regression update

    Date 17 Mar 2013
    73
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    The recent security update for libvirt was found to cause a regression. The kvm/qemu processes weren't run as the `kvm` user anymore in order to fix the file/device ownership changes, but the processes where not correctly configured to use the `kvm` group either. When the user would
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2650-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
    March 17, 2013                         https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libvirt
    Vulnerability  : files and device nodes ownership change to kvm group
    Problem type   : local
    Debian-specific: yes
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-1766
    Debian Bug     : 701649
    
    The recent security update for libvirt was found to cause a regression.
    The kvm/qemu processes weren't run as the `kvm` user anymore in order to
    fix the file/device ownership changes, but the processes where not
    correctly configured to use the `kvm` group either. When the user would
    try to run a virtual machine, the process was denied access to the
    /dev/kvm device node, preventing the virtual machine to run.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.8.3-5+squeeze5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libvirt packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    If you are using full-disk encryption: are you concerned about the resulting performance hit?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
    /main-polls/34-if-you-are-using-full-disk-encryption-are-you-concerned-about-the-resulting-performance-hit?task=poll.vote&format=json
    34
    radio
    [{"id":"120","title":"Yes","votes":"14","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"121","title":"No ","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":41.67,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.