Debian: DSA-2657-1: postgresql-8.4 security update

    Date04 Apr 2013
    CategoryDebian
    25
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    A vulnerability was discovered in PostgreSQL database server. Random numbers generated by contrib/pgcrypto functions may be easy for another database user to guess.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2657-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                         Giuseppe Iuculano
    April 04, 2013                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : postgresql-8.4
    Vulnerability  : guessable random numbers
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-1900
    
    A vulnerability was discovered in PostgreSQL database server. Random numbers
    generated by contrib/pgcrypto functions may be easy for another database user
    to guess.
    
    For the stable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 8.4.17-0squeeze1.
    
    For the testing (wheezy) and unstable distribution (sid), postgresql-8.4
    packages have been removed; in those, this problem has been fixed in
    postgresql-9.1 9.1.9-0wheezy1 (wheezy), and 9.1.9-1 (sid) respectively.
    
    NOTE: postgresql-8.4 in Squeeze is not affected by CVE-2013-1899 (database
    files corruption) and CVE-2013-1901 (unprivileged user can interfere with
    in-progress backups).
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your postgresql-8.4 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":58.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":25,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"2","type":"x","order":"3","pct":16.67,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.