Debian: DSA-2734-1: wireshark security update

    Date05 Aug 2013
    CategoryDebian
    65
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the dissectors for DVB-CI, GSM A Common and ASN.1 PER and in the Netmon file parser. For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2734-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 05, 2013                        http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wireshark
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-4930 CVE-2013-4932 CVE-2013-4933 CVE-2013-4934 
                     CVE-2013-4935
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the dissectors for DVB-CI,
    GSM A Common and ASN.1 PER and in the Netmon file parser.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.2.11-6+squeeze11.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.8.2-5wheezy5.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.10.1-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wireshark packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.