Debian: DSA-2747-1: cacti security update

    Date31 Aug 2013
    CategoryDebian
    66
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in Cacti, a web interface for graphing of monitoring systems: CVE-2013-5588
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2747-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    August 31, 2013                        http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cacti
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-5588 CVE-2013-5589
    
    Two vulnerabilities were discovered in Cacti, a web interface for
    graphing of monitoring systems:
    
    CVE-2013-5588
    
        install/index.php and cacti/host.php suffered from Cross-Site
        Scripting vulnerabilities.
    
    CVE-2013-5589
    
        cacti/host.php contained an SQL injection vulnerability, allowing
        an attacker to execute SQL code on the database used by Cacti.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8a+dfsg-5+deb7u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8b+dfsg-3.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cacti packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"67","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.76,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":12.93,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"34","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.31,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.