Debian: DSA-2759-1: iceweasel security update

    Date18 Sep 2013
    CategoryDebian
    35
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors, buffer overflows may lead to the execution of arbitrary code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2759-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    September 18, 2013                     http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel
    Vulnerability  : several
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-1718 CVE-2013-1722 CVE-2013-1725 CVE-2013-1730 
                     CVE-2013-1732 CVE-2013-1735 CVE-2013-1736 CVE-2013-1737
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version
    of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors,
    buffer overflows may lead to the execution of arbitrary code.
    
    The Iceweasel version in the oldstable distribution (squeeze) is no
    longer supported with security updates.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 17.0.9esr-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 24.0-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.