Debian: DSA-2763-1: pyopenssl security update

    Date 24 Sep 2013
    88
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that PyOpenSSL, a Python wrapper around the OpenSSL library, does not properly handle certificates with NULL characters in the Subject Alternative Name field.
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2763-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
    September 24, 2013                     https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : pyopenssl
    Vulnerability  : hostname check bypassing
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-4314
    Debian Bug     : 722055
    
    It was discovered that PyOpenSSL, a Python wrapper around the OpenSSL
    library, does not properly handle certificates with NULL characters in
    the Subject Alternative Name field.
    
    A remote attacker in the position to obtain a certificate for
    'www.foo.org\0.example.com' from a CA that a SSL client trusts, could
    use this to spoof 'www.foo.org' and conduct man-in-the-middle attacks
    between the PyOpenSSL-using client and the SSL server.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.10-1+squeeze1.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.13-2+deb7u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.13-2.1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your pyopenssl packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"7","type":"x","order":"1","pct":100,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"2","pct":0,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.