Debian: DSA-2841-1: movabletype-opensource security update

    Date11 Jan 2014
    CategoryDebian
    51
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    A cross-site scripting vulnerability was discovered in the rich text editor of the Movable Type blogging engine. For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2841-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    January 11, 2014                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : movabletype-opensource
    Vulnerability  : cross-site scripting
    Problem type   : remote
    Debian-specific: no
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-0977
    Debian Bug     : 734304
    
    A cross-site scripting vulnerability was discovered in the rich text 
    editor of the Movable Type blogging engine.
    
    For the oldstable distribution (squeeze), this problem has been fixed in
    version 4.3.8+dfsg-0+squeeze4.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.1.4+dfsg-4+deb7u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.2.9+dfsg-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your movabletype-opensource packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.