Debian: DSA-2881-1: iceweasel security update

    Date19 Mar 2014
    CategoryDebian
    68
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors, out of bound reads, use-after-frees and other implementation errors may lead to the execution of arbitrary code, information disclosure, denial of
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2881-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 19, 2014                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : iceweasel
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-1493 CVE-2014-1497 CVE-2014-1505 CVE-2014-1508 
                     CVE-2014-1510 CVE-2014-1511 CVE-2014-1512 CVE-2014-1513 
                     CVE-2014-1514
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in Iceweasel, Debian's version
    of the Mozilla Firefox web browser: Multiple memory safety errors, out of
    bound reads, use-after-frees and other implementation errors may lead to
    the execution of arbitrary code, information disclosure, denial of
    service.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 24.4.0esr-1~deb7u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 24.4.0esr-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your iceweasel packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.