Debian: DSA-2887-1: ruby-actionmailer-3.2 security update

    Date27 Mar 2014
    CategoryDebian
    48
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Aaron Neyer discovered that missing input sanitising in the logging component of Ruby Actionmailer could result in denial of service through a malformed e-mail message.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2887-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 27, 2014                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby-actionmailer-3.2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-4389
    
    Aaron Neyer discovered that missing input sanitising in the logging
    component of Ruby Actionmailer could result in denial of service through
    a malformed e-mail message.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.2.6-2+deb7u1.ruby-activesupport-3.2 was updated in a related
    change to version 3.2.6-6+deb7u1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.2.16-3+0 of the rails-3.2 source package.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-actionmailer-3.2 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.