Debian: DSA-2929-1: ruby-actionpack-3.2 security update

    Date16 May 2014
    CategoryDebian
    70
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Action Pack, a compononent of Ruby o Rails. CVE-2014-0081
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2929-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    May 16, 2014                           http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : ruby-actionpack-3.2
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-0081 CVE-2014-0082 CVE-2014-0130
    Debian Bug     : 747382
    
    Several vulnerabilities were discovered in Action Pack, a compononent
    of Ruby o Rails.
    
    CVE-2014-0081
    
        actionview/lib/action_view/helpers/number_helper.rb contains
        multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities
    
    CVE-2014-0082
    
        actionpack/lib/action_view/template/text.rb performs symbol
        interning on MIME type strings, allowing remote denial-of-service
        attacks via increased memory consumption.
    
    CVE-2014-0130
    
        A directory traversal vulnerability in
        actionpack/lib/abstract_controller/base.rb allows remote attackers
        to read arbitrary files.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.2.6-6+deb7u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your ruby-actionpack-3.2 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"64","type":"x","order":"1","pct":57.14,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"33","type":"x","order":"3","pct":29.46,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.