Debian: DSA-2941-1: lxml security update

    Date 01 Jun 2014
    80
    Posted By LinuxSecurity Advisories
    It was discovered that clean_html() function of lxml (pythonic bindings for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries) performed insufficient sanitisation for some non-printable characters. This could lead to cross-site scripting.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2941-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    https://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    Jun 01, 2014                           https://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : lxml
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-3146
    
    It was discovered that clean_html() function of lxml (pythonic bindings 
    for the libxml2 and libxslt libraries) performed insufficient 
    sanitisation for some non-printable characters. This could lead to 
    cross-site scripting.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 2.3.2-1+deb7u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.3.5-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 3.3.5-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your lxml packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    Do you feel that the Lawful Access to Encrypted Data Act, which aims to force encryption backdoors, is a threat to US citizens' privacy?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/30-do-you-feel-that-the-lawful-access-to-encrypted-data-act-which-aims-to-force-encryption-backdoors-is-a-threat-to-privacy?task=poll.vote&format=json
    30
    radio
    [{"id":"106","title":"Yes - I am a privacy advocate and I am strongly opposed to this bill.","votes":"23","type":"x","order":"1","pct":95.83,"resources":[]},{"id":"107","title":"I'm undecided - it has its pros and cons.","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"2","pct":4.17,"resources":[]},{"id":"108","title":"No - I support this bill and feel that it will help protect against crime and threats to our national security. ","votes":"0","type":"x","order":"3","pct":0,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
    bottom 200

    Advisories

    Please enable / Bitte aktiviere JavaScript!
    Veuillez activer / Por favor activa el Javascript![ ? ]

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.