Debian: DSA-2946-1: python-gnupg security update

    Date04 Jun 2014
    CategoryDebian
    58
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the Python wrapper for the Gnu Privacy Guard (GPG). Insufficient sanitising could lead to the execution of arbitrary shell commands.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2946-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 04, 2014                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : python-gnupg
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-7323 CVE-2014-1927 CVE-2014-1928 CVE-2014-1929
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the Python wrapper for the 
    Gnu Privacy Guard (GPG). Insufficient sanitising could lead to the 
    execution of arbitrary shell commands.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.3.6-1~deb7u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.3.6-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.3.6-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your python-gnupg packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":50.65,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"27","type":"x","order":"3","pct":35.06,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.