Debian: DSA-2950-2: openssl update

    Date16 Jun 2014
    CategoryDebian
    39
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    This update updates the upstream fix for CVE-2014-0224 to address problems with CCS which could result in problems with the Postgres database.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2950-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 16, 2014                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : openssl
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-0195 CVE-2014-0221 CVE-2014-0224 CVE-2014-3470
    
    This update updates the upstream fix for CVE-2014-0224 to address 
    problems with CCS which could result in problems with the Postgres 
    database.
    
    In addition this update disables ZLIB compress by default. If you need
    to re-enable it for some reason, you can set the environment variable
    OPENSSL_NO_DEFAULT_ZLIB.
    
    This update also fixes a header declaration which could result in
    build failures in applications using OpenSSL.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.0.1e-2+deb7u11. 
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your openssl packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.