Debian: DSA-2956-1: icinga security update

    Date11 Jun 2014
    CategoryDebian
    66
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Icinga host and network monitoring system (buffer overflows, cross-site request forgery, off-by ones) which could result in the execution of arbitrary code, denial of service or session hijacking.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2956-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 11, 2014                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : icinga
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-7106 CVE-2013-7107 CVE-2013-7108 CVE-2014-1878 
                     CVE-2014-2386
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Icinga host and network
    monitoring system (buffer overflows, cross-site request forgery, off-by
    ones) which could result in the execution of arbitrary code, denial of
    service or session hijacking.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.7.1-7.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.11.0-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.11.0-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your icinga packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.32,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.47,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"26","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.21,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.