Debian: DSA-2958-1: apt security update

    Date12 Jun 2014
    CategoryDebian
    43
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Jakub Wilk discovered that APT, the high level package manager, did not properly perform authentication checks for source packages downloaded via "apt-get source". This only affects use cases where source packages are downloaded via this command; it does not
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2958-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                           Thijs Kinkhorst
    June 12, 2014                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : apt
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-0478
    Debian Bug     : 749795
    
    Jakub Wilk discovered that APT, the high level package manager,
    did not properly perform authentication checks for source packages
    downloaded via "apt-get source". This only affects use cases where
    source packages are downloaded via this command; it does not
    affect regular Debian package installation and upgrading.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.9.7.9+deb7u2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.0.4.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your apt packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.