Debian: DSA-2963-1: lucene-solr security update

    Date17 Jun 2014
    CategoryDebian
    36
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in Solr, an open source enterprise search server based on Lucene, resulting in information disclosure or code execution.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2963-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 17, 2014                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : lucene-solr
    CVE ID         : CVE-2013-6397 CVE-2013-6407 CVE-2013-6408
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were found in Solr, an open source enterprise 
    search server based on Lucene, resulting in information disclosure or 
    code execution.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.6.0+dfsg-1+deb7u1.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.6.2+dfsg-2.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 3.6.2+dfsg-2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your lucene-solr packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"1","pct":54.35,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"2","pct":10.87,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"16","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.78,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.