Debian: DSA-2970-1: cacti security update

    Date29 Jun 2014
    CategoryDebian
    58
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues (cross-site scripting, cross-site request forgery, SQL injections, missing input sanitising) have been found in Cacti, a web frontend for RRDTool.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-2970-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    June 29, 2014                          http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cacti
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-2326 CVE-2014-2327 CVE-2014-2328 CVE-2014-2708 
                     CVE-2014-2709 CVE-2014-4002
    
    Multiple security issues (cross-site scripting, cross-site request 
    forgery, SQL injections, missing input sanitising) have been found in 
    Cacti, a web frontend for RRDTool. 
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8a+dfsg-5+deb7u3.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8b+dfsg-6.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8b+dfsg-6.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cacti packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: http://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.