Debian: DSA-3007-1: cacti security update

    Date20 Aug 2014
    CategoryDebian
    38
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues (cross-site scripting, missing input sanitising and SQL injection) have been discovered in Cacti, a web interface for graphing of monitoring systems.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3007-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    August 20, 2014                        http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : cacti
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-5025 CVE-2014-5026 CVE-2014-5027 CVE-2014-5261 
                     CVE-2014-5262
    
    Multiple security issues (cross-site scripting, missing input sanitising
    and SQL injection) have been discovered in Cacti, a web interface for 
    graphing of monitoring systems.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8a+dfsg-5+deb7u4.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 0.8.8b+dfsg-8.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your cacti packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"5","type":"x","order":"1","pct":55.56,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"3","type":"x","order":"2","pct":33.33,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"1","type":"x","order":"3","pct":11.11,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.