Debian: DSA-3049-1: wireshark security update

    Date14 Oct 2014
    CategoryDebian
    62
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the dissectors/parsers for RTP, MEGACO, Netflow, RTSP, SES and Sniffer, which could result in denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3049-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    October 14, 2014                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : wireshark
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-6422 CVE-2014-6423 CVE-2014-6424 CVE-2014-6427 
                     CVE-2014-6428 CVE-2014-6429 CVE-2014-6430 CVE-2014-6431
                     CVE-2014-6432
    
    Multiple vulnerabilities were discovered in the dissectors/parsers for
    RTP, MEGACO, Netflow, RTSP, SES and Sniffer, which could result in denial
    of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.8.2-5wheezy12.
    
    For the testing distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.12.1+g01b65bf-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.12.1+g01b65bf-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your wireshark packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.32,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.47,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"26","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.21,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.