Debian: DSA-3074-2: php5 regression update

    Date19 Nov 2014
    CategoryDebian
    65
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    The previous update for php5, DSA-3074-1, introduced regression in the sessionclean cron script. The change was intended to fix a potential symlink attack using filenames including the NULL character (Debian bug #766147), but depended on sed package version too recent, not in Wheezy.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA512
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3074-2                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    http://www.debian.org/security/                         Yves-Alexis Perez
    November 19, 2014                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : php5
    
    The previous update for php5, DSA-3074-1, introduced regression in the
    sessionclean cron script. The change was intended to fix a potential
    symlink attack using filenames including the NULL character (Debian bug
    #766147), but depended on sed package version too recent, not in Wheezy.
    
    This update reverts the fix, so people are advised to keep kernel
    symlink protection (sysctl fs.protected_symlinks=1) enabled as it is by
    default on Wheezy, which is enough to prevent successful exploitation.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 5.4.35-0+deb7u2.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your php5 packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.