Debian: DSA-3087-1: qemu security update

    Date04 Dec 2014
    CategoryDebian
    44
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Paolo Bonzini of Red Hat discovered that the blit region checks were insufficient in the Cirrus VGA emulator in qemu, a fast processor emulator. A privileged guest user could use this flaw to write into qemu address space on the host, potentially escalating their privileges to
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3087-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                      Salvatore Bonaccorso
    December 04, 2014                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : qemu
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-8106
    
    Paolo Bonzini of Red Hat discovered that the blit region checks were
    insufficient in the Cirrus VGA emulator in qemu, a fast processor
    emulator. A privileged guest user could use this flaw to write into qemu
    address space on the host, potentially escalating their privileges to
    those of the qemu host process.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.1.2+dfsg-6a+deb7u6.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your qemu packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"39","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.32,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"11","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.47,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"26","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.21,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.