Debian: DSA-3107-1: subversion security update

    Date20 Dec 2014
    CategoryDebian
    45
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Evgeny Kotkov discovered a NULL pointer dereference while processing REPORT requests in mod_dav_svn, the Subversion component which is used to serve repositories with the Apache web server. A remote attacker could abuse this vulnerability for a denial of service.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3107-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                            Florian Weimer
    December 20, 2014                      http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : subversion
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-3580
    Debian Bug     : 773263
    
    Evgeny Kotkov discovered a NULL pointer dereference while processing
    REPORT requests in mod_dav_svn, the Subversion component which is used
    to serve repositories with the Apache web server.  A remote attacker
    could abuse this vulnerability for a denial of service.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u7.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 1.8.10-5.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your subversion packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"13","type":"x","order":"1","pct":52,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":16,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"8","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.