Debian: DSA-3120-1: mantis security update

    Date06 Jan 2015
    CategoryDebian
    49
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Mantis bug tracking system, which may result in phishing, information disclosure, CAPTCHA bypass, SQL injection, cross-site scripting or the execution of arbitrary PHP code.
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3120-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    January 06, 2015                       http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : mantis
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-6316 CVE-2014-7146 CVE-2014-8553 CVE-2014-8554 
                     CVE-2014-8598 CVE-2014-8986 CVE-2014-8988 CVE-2014-9089
                     CVE-2014-9117 CVE-2014-9269 CVE-2014-9270 CVE-2014-9271
                     CVE-2014-9272 CVE-2014-9280 CVE-2014-9281 CVE-2014-9388
    
    Multiple security issues have been found in the Mantis bug tracking 
    system, which may result in phishing, information disclosure, CAPTCHA 
    bypass, SQL injection, cross-site scripting or the execution of arbitrary
    PHP code.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 1.2.18-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your mantis packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.