Debian: DSA-3189-1: libav security update

    Date15 Mar 2015
    CategoryDebian
    105
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Several security issues have been corrected in multiple demuxers and decoders of the libav multimedia library. A full list of the changes is available at http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=blob;f=Changelog;hb=refs/tags/v0.8.17
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3189-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 15, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : libav
    CVE ID         : CVE-2014-7933 CVE-2014-8543 CVE-2014-8544 CVE-2014-8547 
                     CVE-2014-8548 CVE-2014-9604
    
    Several security issues have been corrected in multiple demuxers and
    decoders of the libav multimedia library. A full list of the changes is
    available at
    http://git.libav.org/?p=libav.git;a=blob;f=Changelog;hb=refs/tags/v0.8.17
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), these problems have been fixed in
    version 6:0.8.17-1.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in
    version 6:11.3-1.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your libav packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"15","type":"x","order":"1","pct":53.57,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"4","type":"x","order":"2","pct":14.29,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"9","type":"x","order":"3","pct":32.14,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.