Debian: DSA-3190-1: putty security update

    Date15 Mar 2015
    CategoryDebian
    75
    Posted ByLinuxSecurity Advisories
    Patrick Coleman discovered that the Putty SSH client failed to wipe out unused sensitive memory. In addition Florent Daigniere discovered that exponential values in
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Debian Security Advisory DSA-3190-1                   This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    	
    http://www.debian.org/security/                        Moritz Muehlenhoff
    March 15, 2015                         http://www.debian.org/security/faq
    - -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Package        : putty
    CVE ID         : CVE-2015-2157
    
    Patrick Coleman discovered that the Putty SSH client failed to wipe out
    unused sensitive memory.
    
    In addition Florent Daigniere discovered that exponential values in
    Diffie Hellman exchanges were insufficienty restricted.
    
    For the stable distribution (wheezy), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.62-9+deb7u2.
    
    For the upcoming stable distribution (jessie), this problem has been
    fixed in version 0.63-10.
    
    For the unstable distribution (sid), this problem has been fixed in
    version 0.63-10.
    
    We recommend that you upgrade your putty packages.
    
    Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply
    these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
    found at: https://www.debian.org/security/
    
    Mailing list: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
    
    You are not authorised to post comments.

    Comments powered by CComment

    LinuxSecurity Poll

    What do you think of the articles on LinuxSecurity?

    No answer selected. Please try again.
    Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
    Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 3 answer(s).
    /main-polls/24-what-do-you-think-of-the-quality-of-the-articles-on-linuxsecurity?task=poll.vote&format=json
    24
    radio
    [{"id":"87","title":"Excellent, don't change a thing!","votes":"37","type":"x","order":"1","pct":51.39,"resources":[]},{"id":"88","title":"Should be more technical","votes":"10","type":"x","order":"2","pct":13.89,"resources":[]},{"id":"89","title":"Should include more HOWTOs","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"3","pct":34.72,"resources":[]}]["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"]["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"]350
    bottom200

    Advisories

    We use cookies to provide and improve our services. By using our site, you consent to our Cookie Policy.